Custom Bike Dynamo Plan

>> Gelmini dixit: a round table (virtual) with the Minister

GELMINI : "The objectives of the reform c 'is to delete the ' ideology of egalitarianism : "We want to erase from the school and the university's ideology of egalitarianism, of 18 or 6 to all political, and we want to do because we have faith in people." (From the Stampa.it Repubblica.it and Nov. 16.)
mp: do not know what "the ideology of egalitarianism" referred to the school and university. It 's a philosophical consideration of anti-social? We are in the EGUILITARISMO SOCIAL!

Gelmini But we believe that it relates to other with this expression. But as usual, failing to communicate the concept is expressed with slogans that have nothing to do with the proceedings. He could have said that you disagree with the promotion for all. and that's it.

GELMINI: But it is the 'ideology of egalitarianism that made our class teacher, among the lowest paid in Europe, and our society between the less equal in Europe. It is true that there are equal opportunities.
mp: We do not understand the relevance between TESTS and SALARIES Minister. The "meritocracy" that would reward teachers is something quite "subjective" and therefore "biased" (who will decide the matter? What are the criteria?). That the Italian teachers are the lowest paid in Europe is that statistic. The causes do not depend at all from the examination and promotion. Do not be confused. There is already enough!

GELMINI , but there is no "equal opportunity" in Italian schools ....
mp: No understand what he's talking about. Be more careful with these slogans, we need precise statistics, such as that according to the OECD, indicate the primary school between the excellence worldwide.

Then why decided to change - as the first acts of government - the Elementary School? It was instead to indicate a reform to the Middle School which is apparent "degradation".

and the universe? He gave the numbers, and those should be distinguished and not make "every herb bundle. has proposed cutting the unproductive and does not attend classes, and on this we agree. But the 133 size University resources in an indiscriminate manner, without any real analysis of the management University. He proposed to turn the public institutions with the "private" foundations. All with the usual slogan that the school should be managed as a company! No. We do not agree and will defend the public school with all our energy.