Subject: I do not know who to cast my vote next election. But I know where to turn my attention: towards the center left. Let me explain why.
CDL. The deployment that would revolutionize Italy, projected into a healthy liberalism has failed many of its goals. There are many reasons of contrast, the first of a mild sensitivity to the law.
LegaNord , despite its 4% poor, in my opinion was able to satisfy his constituency better than others, taking home important maneuvers such as devolution (unless of plot twists to last place), changing institutional framework of country. The reason for not voting should be obvious: they are contrary to his populist attitude, that does not look beyond the neighborhood of its existence.
National Alliance not as it should have stood out in these years of government. He has excelled for more action personal information (such as those of Fisichella, always on the devolution, or how those purposes, for example about the vote in local elections to immigrants) and for an effective unified program. Remember the earthquake of June, which threatened to cause a huge schism.
be noted positively the investigation of waste and patronage of the regional bell.
The candidacy of Prime Minister Gianfranco Fini is certainly no reason to trust in a solid character and worthy of Italian politics. But not enough for me.
Forza Italy, the "base" of Berlusconi, was intended as a hotbed of men change. In fact it has been a recycling plant and / or parking lot of political hobbyists, and for that reason I discarded almost immediately.
L 'UDC brought down a government, is riding the wave of a vague and centrist Catholic revival, but raised in addition to "signs of instability" and a certain opportunism seems to me there is little substance.
Step to the other side of the fence.
UDEUR , the home of mastelliani. Voice of the South. Or, rather, the voice of the smart south. A party that stands up thanks to its customers and thanks to the greed of the Great Center, home of compromise and immobility. The
Margaret, who started in the middle between centripetal forces and desired reforms left-handed, stood out for an 'intransigent opposition, "reckless regard for what the opposition will only know the uncompromising Rutelli. I would save Parisi, a real strategist and horse race. I have not digested the turnout of the referendum, which to me is a wound still open. The Greens
, with their rhetoric that rarely brings in its concrete content, belong to the tradition of "a few ideas but very confused." Theoretically, it is very good reasons to put environmental policy, but the Greens, in my view, have not been able to translate this project on a practical level, basking in demagoguery.
Refoundation Communist, after the blow to primary Bertinotti, continues to talk of revolution, returning to the old ideology, the old parties. I trust the intelligence of Faustus, but the ambiguity as regards the facts of Bologna and dangerous blows to the head of which stood out (the most severe in 1998), as well as other facts of no less gravity (such as the proposed close CPT) does not lead me to give him confidence.
Who's left? SDI, the Italian Communists, Radicals, Democrats of the Left, and the project brave. Discarding
SDI and PDCI on the fly, remain the last three.
Ideologically I feel very close to the radical liberal, liberal, libertarian. Ie: no interference Catholic business executive, scientific research without ethical constraints irrational opposition to a sudden withdrawal of Italian troops in Iraq (rather a "scheduling", as it seems to want to understand even Prodi). I am hesitant, however, leaves the spasmodic demand for amnesty. And I perplime alliance with the Socialists. In addition, Marco Pannella and its often remain isolated in our national political landscape. A lone voice, with ideas and ideals not that much innovative.
So, should I trust the DS and Prodi. In fact, Prodi to the project, which involves not only the Democrats of the Left, but the entire center. On site, there is surely something great: a party Ten million votes. The triumph of bipolarity, in fact. A long and obstacle-strewn path (the same Prodi acknowledged that it would take at least 5 years of the first to see tangible results), I certainly interesting and exciting in my opinion. But even here there are the negative notes: born and if a coalition party hostage? And if you were back all'ingovernabilità?
What I hope is a "third way" Italian . A conscientious energy policy (read: more space for alternative and renewable sources in times compatible with the consumer, perhaps taking a cue from the famous "ordenanza solar" English), a serious reappraisal of nuclear power (and already here come the first by Professor disappointment: he confirmed his opposition to power), greater protection of employees; rehabilitation education and research, the fight against waste, to the clienteles, commissions, administrations mangiasoldi; statement of law through the persecution of tax evasion and organized crime, granting the right to vote in local elections to the immigrants, reducing the financial gap between north and south (with a progress of the South, of course: D). All with a (nice) po 'Zapatero, especially as regards the substance.
discuss this issue again in January.
Excuse for any partiality with which I dealt with the facts: this is a very subjective discussion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment